日本精品在线一区,天堂久久一区二区,国产精品久久久久久久久久不蜜月,午夜久久久久久久久久一区二区,久久免费99精品久久久久久,久久久久久1,久久久久久久久久网站

資訊|論壇|病例

搜索

首頁 醫(yī)學論壇 專業(yè)文章 醫(yī)學進展 簽約作者 病例中心 快問診所 愛醫(yī)培訓(xùn) 醫(yī)學考試 在線題庫 醫(yī)學會議

您所在的位置:首頁 > 呼吸科診療指南 > 2001ACCP詢證指南:脫機與中止通氣支持

2001ACCP詢證指南:脫機與中止通氣支持

2013-09-06 11:27 閱讀:1436 來源:愛愛醫(yī)資源網(wǎng) 責任編輯:李思杰
[導(dǎo)讀] 《2001ACCP詢證指南:脫機與中止通氣支持》內(nèi)容預(yù)覽 To address many of these issues, the Agency for Health- care Policy and Research (AHCPR) charged the McMaster University Evidence Based Practice Center to do a com-prehensive evidence-based

《2001ACCP詢證指南:脫機與中止通氣支持》內(nèi)容預(yù)覽

To address many of these issues, the Agency for Health- care Policy and Research (AHCPR) charged the McMaster University Evidence Based Practice Center to do a com-prehensive evidence-based review of many of the issues involved in ventilator weaning/discontinuation. Led by Deborah Cook MD, an exhaustive review of several thou-sand articles in the world literature resulted in a compre- hensive assessment of the state of the literature in 1999.

At the same time, the American College of Chest Physi-cians (ACCP), the Society for Critical Care Medicine (SCCM), and the American Association for Respiratory Care (AARC) formed a task force to produce evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for managing the venti-lator-dependent patient during the discontinuation process. The charge of this task force was to utilize the McMaster AHCPR report as well as their own literature review to address the following 5 issues: (1) the pathophysiology of ventilator dependence; (2) the criteria for identifying pa-tients who are capable of ventilator discontinuation; (3) ventilator management strategies to maximize discontinu-ation potential; (4) the role of tracheotomy; and (5) the role of long-term facilities. Review/writing teams were formed for each of these issues.

From these evidence-based reviews, a series of rec-ommendations were developed by the task force, which are the basis of this report. Each recommendation is followed by a review of the supporting evidence, in-cluding an assessment of the strength of the evidence (Table 1). As there were many areas in which evidence was weak or absent, the expert opinion of the task force was relied on to “fill in the gaps.” Consensus was reached,first, by team discussions and, later, through the re-peated cycling of the draft through all members of the task force.

點擊下載完整版:《2001ACCP詢證指南:脫機與中止通氣支持》
 


分享到:
  版權(quán)聲明:

  本站所注明來源為"愛愛醫(yī)"的文章,版權(quán)歸作者與本站共同所有,非經(jīng)授權(quán)不得轉(zhuǎn)載。

  本站所有轉(zhuǎn)載文章系出于傳遞更多信息之目的,且明確注明來源和作者,不希望被轉(zhuǎn)載的媒體或個人可與我們

  聯(lián)系zlzs@120.net,我們將立即進行刪除處理

意見反饋 關(guān)于我們 隱私保護 版權(quán)聲明 友情鏈接 聯(lián)系我們

Copyright 2002-2025 Iiyi.Com All Rights Reserved

天等县| 泸州市| 札达县| 武清区| 大余县| 平塘县| 深圳市| 丽水市| 金乡县| 富川| 阿合奇县| 大连市| 大渡口区| 锦屏县| 顺昌县| 乳山市| 康保县| 嘉善县| 张家港市| 喀什市| 睢宁县| 桃源县| 青神县| 荔波县| 桦甸市| 边坝县| 朝阳区| 萨嘎县| 连城县| 清水河县| 通道| 长沙县| 玛沁县| 张家港市| 桑日县| 安达市| 华蓥市| 淳化县| 芦山县| 寻甸| 胶州市|